Writing for the Lay Reader
Today-more than ever-people are looking for information
that will make their lives better. But the average person-regardless
of education-doesn't know about the treasure trove of research
information in scientific reports. In fact, statistics
show that a typical academic journal article is read by less than
a thousand people.
Accustomed to newspapers and magazines, the typical
reader, if he or she does obtain a scientific document, finds
academic language difficult to understand. That is because:
-
Important facts are hard to find in the lengthy text and
report organization
-
Statistics and methods don't interest them
-
The text includes unfamiliar words
The following is a checklist to help you write so that the
average reader will want to read and possibly use your research
findings.
These tips, based on dissemination research, will
allow you to share your research to a broader audience.
Suggestions
Streamline information by eliminating unnecessary
detail. Research doesn't always lend itself to succinct bottom
lines. An author who gives every research detail, loses readers
unable or unwilling to decipher the main points or "guts" of the
research. Take time to thoroughly digest content, especially
the discussion and results section of your publication. Extract
the essence. Your efforts will pay off: Clear thinking produces
clear writing.
Tell the reader the benefits of your research. As
all advertisers know, the benefit is the first interest of any
consumer.
Assure the reader if the research information involves
change. Address the fears, resistance, and anxiety that typically
accompany change.
Communicate directly to your audience-not above,
nor below. Readers should be comfortable with your publication
and not feel as if they were "outsiders."
You cannot assume the reader understands nothing.
. .or everything. Some researchers may be secretly pleased if
their writing is not understood. They assume that only the most
intelligent can understand their publication.
Readers who buy into that thinking blame themselves
for incomprehension. That's faulty logic. Because if a reader
can't understand writing, that is the writer's fault, not the
reader's. Considerate writers communicate clearly.
Be specific. Use concrete language rather than abstract
or vague rhetoric. A "sizable" reduction in disability parking
space violation takes on new meaning if the reduction is 10%,
40%, or 95%.
Keep your audience's vocabulary in mind as
you write. A scholarly document, for example, uses the technical
language of its particular field to reach a strictly-defined audience.
A news article, on the other hand, aims for as wide an audience
as possible and avoids technical terms except when needed.
Instead of using arcane acronyms and technical words of your field,
substitute common words, such as do (implement), ease (facilitate),
price (cost impact considerations), or in short (synopsis).
If it is necessary to use a certain technical word
for precision of meaning, do so. But give a concise, working definition
for the word as soon as you use it.
Write in "plain English," "down-to-earth," the way
you would in casual conversation. Conversational words better
lend themselves to clear writing than formal, multi-syllabic words.
Also, refrain from using words built on Latin and
Greek prefixes, suffixes, and roots. Shorter, more common words
are easier to understand. Actually, avoid foreign words in general.
Once again, this "rule" can be broken if the reader
is informed of the word meaning: The average reader can process
multi-syllablic and unfamiliar words as long as they are clearly
explained.
Use the active verb voice. Scientific journals typically
employ the passive verb voice for an impersonal description
of processes. (When the subject is acted upon, the verb is in
the passive voice, e.g. The report was written by the researcher.)
Lay publications instead use the active verb voice for a strong,
direct style. (If the subject performs the action, the verb is
in the active voice, e.g. The researcher wrote the report.) This
is because the active voice is less evasive than passive and engages
reader quicker.
Limit each sentence to one idea. The skill to efficiently
grasp meaning is not related to intelligence or advanced degrees.
Even highly educated people find it's easier to decipher complex
material when presented clearly. Unlike a mystery story,
the reason for your communication should be bold and clear in
each sentence.
Shorter is better. Sentences more than 25 words
overwhelm short-term memory. Often, it's not the sentence length
that confuses readers, it is the sentence's complexity.
Keep paragraphs short. The "shorter is better" advice
applies to each paragraph. In most writing, lengthy paragraphs
indicate a lack of focus. Measure paragraphs by number of
text lines, not sentences.
Avoid tedious grammatical constructions. Beware
of conditions( e.g., if, then), multiple negatives (e.g., not
uncooperative), and long strings of nouns.
Prune prepositional phrases. They often just pad
the distance from idea to another
Avoid using nouns as verbs. Examples of this
include to impact or to interface. That same advice applies to
turning simple verbs into phrases. Contact is more to the
point than make contact with.
Avoid redundant word combinations. Do you need "future"
before "plan" or "end" before "result?" You know the answer to
that question!
Read sentences aloud to test clarity. Reading helps
you hear whether the sentence is too awkward, confusing, or long.
Weave analogies and examples into your report. These
brief examples personalize research and present it in a way that
people can understand.
Take advantage of visual aids to emphasize significant
details. Often that pie chart or bar graph is the only piece of
information a reader will take note of and retain.
Use your word-processing software to let you know
how readable your text is. The "Tool" section of most word
processing programs contains a grammar check program. Not only
does it highlight possible grammatical problems, the program also
measures readability.
Using a calculation that factors in the size of
syllables, words, sentences, and paragraphs, this program produces
a readability index. If your end number is more than 13, you are
sure to lose reader interest.
Aim for an index number of 9 or less (newspapers
come in around 8) to hold reader attention. However, don't
rely too much on these formulas and index numbers.
The scoring does not take into account such factors
as numerals (which read as shorter words); citations (each
one can add many words to a sentence); or necessary technical
words (sometimes there is no way around words such as empowerment
or web site addresses-both of which then raise the syllable count.)
The preceding paragraph, which was one sentence,
has 52 words. Sentences such as this with its listing makes the
index numbers skyrocket. Yet, the semicolons, parentheses, and
dash helped make it understandable.
As Dr. Rudolph Flesch, the inventor of a readability
test once said, "Readability doesn't mean blindly following a
formula. It means trying to write so that the average newspaper
reader will read, understand, and remember."
There shouldn't be an aura of mystery attached to
writing. If you know whom you are writing and have something worth
communicating, you're more than half way to the finish line!