|
Training & Technical
Assistance Needs--Delphi Results
back to topINDEPENDENT
LIVING CENTER
MANAGEMENT ISSUES
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
June 1991
1. Developing a long-term, broad-based, stable financial
foundation.
2. Being able to expand services offered to the consumer
with a limited number of staff and a limited budget.
3. Relations with board of directors, i.e., making
the board feel involved in the operations of the ILC without
having control over all functions.
4. Public relations, i.e., developing an independent
living identity.
5. Board relations . . . effectiveness . . . consumer-direction
. . . what does it really
mean?
(TIE)
5. Board recruitment.
7. Keeping center staff working in a happy medium
so that the staff operates as a team rather than individually.
(TIE)
7. Maintaining/developing the philosophy of the independent
living movement by developing a cadre of new leadership
in ILCs.
9. Stress management and avoiding burnout.
9. Personnel issues.
(TIE)
9. Evaluation--reasonable accountability is O.K.,
but the welter of federal and state evaluations may threaten
ILCs with over-bureaucratization and takes us away from
our central focus--the independence of people with disabilities.
9. Developing and maintaining appropriate means of
communication with other ILCs and service providers so that
areas of service can increase and the center's identity
is not lost.
________________________
*Results of a study conducted by ILRU using
a modified Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet,
Suite 101, Houston, Texas 77005
713-666-6244, 666-0643 (TDD) |
back to topINDEPENDENT
LIVING CENTER
MANAGEMENT ISSUES
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. How to foster and maintain true consumer involvement
in management of the center.
2. How to cost out programs; how to set up services
on a fee-for-service basis--setting up small business/revenue-producing
programs.
3. How to maintain an adequate and consistent cash
flow.
(TIE) 4. Locating,
hiring, and effectively training qualified staff who have
disabilities.
(TIE) 4. Fund raising,
the ability of a center to generate adequate funding.
(TIE) 6. Working cooperatively
and effectively with the board of directors.
(TIE) 6. Long-range
planning--managing growth.
8. Determining most effective use of staff time and
resources when there are mutliple needs to be met.
9. Personnel management, motivation, job satisfaction,
and production.
10. Health insurance.
*Results of a study conducted by ILRU using
a modified Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet,
Suite 101, Houston, Texas 77005
713-666-6244, 666-0643 (TDD)
4/91 |
back to topINDEPENDENT
LIVING CENTER
MANAGEMENT ISSUES
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. Fund Raising (Grants, Fee-for-Service, Contracts, Donations,
Special Events)
2. Board Effectiveness (Recruiting, Training, Proper Use)
3. Program Evaluation/Quality Assurance (Addressing Standards,
Implementing a Systematic Evaluation Protocol, Using Evaluation
Results Constructively)
4. Financial Stability (Diversification of Funding Sources,
Income Maintenance, Contingency Planning)
5. Staff Development (Creating Opportunities, Adequate
Training, Monitoring Progress)
6. Community and Public Relations (Consumers, Services
Providers, General Public)
7. Long-Range Planning (Forecasting, Contingency Planning,
Monitoring)
8. Outreach to Underserved Populations (Identifying Underserved
Populations, Defining Needs, Developing Effective Programming)
9. Team Building (Developing Sound Philosophical Basis,
Translating
Philosophy into Actions, Encouraging Participative Problem-solving
Approaches)
10. Consumer Involvement (Board/Staff/Volunteer Roles,
Qualifications, Reasonable Accommodation)
*Results of a study conducted by ILRU using a modified
Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet, Suite 101,
Houston, TX 77005 713-666-6244 666-0643 (TDD).
3/90 |
back to topISSUES
OF IMPORTANCE IN MANAGING ADVOCACY PROGRAMS
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. Dealing with consumer apathy on advocacy issues so that
consumers are involved effectively in advocacy efforts,
and center staff and board do not have to carry the whole
load.
2. Balancing advocacy activities and service delivery activities
in centers.
3. Obtaining funding to support advocacy efforts that is
not earmarked for specific non-advocacy service delivery.
4. Developing effective strategies for advocacy efforts
and preparing leaders to use those strategies.
5. Training board and staff on what advocacy is, how to
teach advocacy skills to consumers, and how to be more effective
advocates themselves.
6. Educating consumers and providing them with knowledge
and skills to advocate effectively on issues.
7. Giving advocacy work a high enough priority in the center
workload and freeing up staff time from service delivery
to do advocacy.
8. Setting priorities for advocacy efforts that appropriately
involve
consumers, staff, and board members of center.
9. Involving board members in advocacy efforts and having
approaches in place--including a board committee or subcommittee
with responsibility for advocacy efforts--to assure board
involvement and oversight of advocacy efforts.
10. Recruiting, hiring, and training qualified staff to
lead advocacy efforts.
*Preliminary results of a study conducted by ILRU using
a modified Delphi approach. IIRU, 3400 Bissonnet,
Suite 101, Houston, TX 77005 713-666-6244 666-0643 (TDD).
2/90 |
back to topISSUES
OF IMPORTANCE IN MANAGING
INDEPENDENT LIVING SKILLS TRAINING PROGRAMS
as identified by
CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. Securing and maintaining adequate funding to support
the skills training program.
2. Dealing with lack of community resources (e.g., accessible
housing, attendant care, transportation) required for training
to be effective.
3. Incorporating self-advocacy skills into all aspects
of the skills training program.
4. Recruiting qualified people to do independent living
skills training.
5. Identifying or developing an effective skills training
curriculum.
6. Assessing consumer needs and developing appropriate
independent
living plans for addressing those needs.
7. Insuring that independent living planning is consumer
directed.
8. Meeting the needs of persons with all types of disabilities.
9. Determining if services are effective for both the individual
being served and for the program as a whole.
10. Incorporating independent living philosophy into the
skills training program.
*Preliminary results of a study conducted by ILRU using
a modified Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet,
Suite 101, Houston, TX 77005 713-666-6244 666-0643 (TDD)
3/89 |
back to topLEADERSHIP
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. Preparing budgets and managing finances
2. Writing and developing grants
3. Developing a quality assurance approach for determining
quality and consistency of center program
4. Seeing the "whole picture' (relationship of program
to center, center to movement, etc.)
4. Lack of understanding about the independent living philosophy
and movement
6. Failure to recognize that centers are businesses
6. Lack of supervisory skills:
Performance evaluation
Recruiting and hiring
Disciplining
8. Implementing organizational change
9. Lack of knowledge and skills in how to motivate consumers
to become more active in disability rights issues
10. Solving the problem of being constrained by funding
sources
11. Training for staff and board on the ILC role in the
community
11. Dealing with problems associated with centers becoming
more bureaucratic
13. Translating the independent living philosophy into
practice
14. Lack of time to operate the center and at the same
time to be involved in the movement at a national level
14. Lack of knowledge of computer systems
*Preliminary results of a study conducted by ILRU using
a modified Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet,
Suite 101, Houston, TX 77005 713-666-6244, 666-0643 (TDD).
5/88 |
back to topISSUES
OF IMPORTANCE IN MANAGING PEER COUNSELING PROGRAMS
as identified by
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER DIRECTORS*
1. Evaluating peer counseling services
2. Documenting peer counseling services and outcomes consistently
3. Reducing risk of center liability
4. Developing entrance criteria for consumers entering
the peer counseling program
5. Lack of funding for peer counseling program
6. Lack of funding for peer counselor training and networking
7. Evaluating individual peer counselor performance
8. Recruiting peer counselor
9. Lack of guidelines to distinguish "peer counseling"
from "therapy"
10. Maintaining and coordinating a pool of trained volunteer
peer counselors
11. Time management: not enough time for recruitment, coordination,
training, follow-up
11. Resolving differences between people with different
disabilities and experiences and integration of underserved
populations
13. Developing a training curriculum to involve consumers
as providers of peer counseling
14. Assuring coordination among the peer counseling program
and other center program areas
14. Difficulty in meeting consumer needs
14. Developing skills in peer counselors so that they know
when bounds are exceeded
14. Overcoming travel problems for peer counseling
program participation
* Results of a study conducted by ILRU using a modified
Delphi approach. ILRU, 3400 Bissonnet, Suite 101,
Houston, TX 77005 713-666-6244, 666-0643 (TDD).
5/88 |
|
|